“This was a dangerous film to make because it couldn’t happen. How ironic.”
Director Peter Weir on The Truman Show predicting the rise of reality television.
In 2008, Popular Mechanics named The Truman Show as one of the 10 most prophetic science fiction films (it was number 4). Journalist Erik Sofge argued that the story reflects the falseness of reality television. “Truman simply lives, and the show’s popularity is its straightforward voyeurism. And, like Big Brother, Survivor, and every other reality show on the air, none of his environment is actually real.” He deemed it an eerie coincidence that Big Brother made its debut a year after the film’s release, and he also compared the film to the 2003 program The Joe Schmo Show: “Unlike Truman, Matt Gould could see the cameras, but all of the other contestants were paid actors, playing the part of various reality-show stereotypes. While Matt eventually got all of the prizes in the rigged contest, the show’s central running joke was in the same existential ballpark as The Truman Show.” Weir declared, “There has always been this question: Is the audience getting dumber? Or are we filmmakers patronising them? Is this what they want? Or is this what we’re giving them? But the public went to my film in large numbers. And that has to be encouraging.”
Ronald Bishop of Sage Journals Online thought The Truman Show showcased the power of the media. Truman’s life inspires audiences around the world, meaning their lives are controlled by his. Bishop commented, “In the end, the power of the media is affirmed rather than challenged. In the spirit of Antonio Gramsci’s concept of hegemony, these films and television programs co-opt our enchantment (and disenchantment) with the media and sell it back to us.”
Material from Wikipedia.