Be afraid, very afraid – again

Today in class we looked at a couple of Mark Kermode’s film reviews. I have added part of his review of Steven Spielberg’s ‘War of the Worlds’. A movie I must admit that I have chosen not to watch (the Tom Cruise factor) but it is one that many of you have seen and as it is directed by Spielberg it will get you thinking about his directing style.

Almost exactly 30 years ago, in the summer of 1975, Steven Spielberg’s Jaws established a template for the modern blockbuster which helped make him the world’s most bankable director. Adapted from a bestseller about everyday folk being hunted by an unstoppable killing machine, Jaws sold 25 million tickets in 38 days.

In one mighty gobble, Spielberg’s sleekly mechanical hit swallowed up Hollywood’s European-arthouse affectations and dragged mainstream cinema back to its carnival sideshow roots, offering a rollercoaster ride through microcosmic Americana, filled with threatening chills and thrills, but ending with the promise of a family hug.

With War of the Worlds, Spielberg has come full circle. Since Jaws he has salved his artistic conscience with worthy dirges such as Schindler’s List and Amistad and even toyed with Stanley Kubrick’s sombre mantle by adopting his unrealised dream project Artificial Intelligence: AI. Now he returns to his popcorn roots, serving up a voracious big-budget action-spectacular with a pleasingly ravenous bite.

Even more so than Jurassic Park, War of the Worlds mimics the trusty Jaws formula of helpless Americans preyed on by ruthless inhuman predators. ‘They’re from someplace else!’ gasps Tom Cruise after first setting eyes on the towering Tripods, to which his slacker son replies: ‘What, you mean… Europe?’ In fact, he means outer space, but in the post-9/11 climate of Spielberg’s explosive potboiler, there is really very little difference … read the rest here.

Elephant paints self-portrait

If you not one of the millions of people who has seen this clip on Youtube, it is an elephant painting a picture. I don’t know whether to be concerned about animal abuse or the fact the elephant is a more gifted artist than me.

Owen essays

If you are in Year 11, you will have started to write your first short texts essays and you may like a little help with them. To do that, I have added a student’s essay on Wilfred Owen for you to consider. What do you think works in the essay? Why? What would you change?

Describe an effective use of imagery in each text. Explain how this effective use of imagery helped you to understand an idea or ideas in each text.

Wilfred Owen was a World War One poet who used his poetry to provide gruesome imagery to convey to the reader the horrific reality of war and death at war. In his poem “Dulce Et Decorum Est” Owen shows his raw anger at how young men’s lives have been brutally disfigured through the reality of war and death at the front.

“Anthem for Doomed Youth” carries a more sombre tone and also explores death at the front by comparing it with death at home in Britain.In the poem “Dulce Et Decorum Est” Wilfred Owen’s strong use of similes conveys the harsh realities of war and death at the front.

In the first stanza Owen uses the simile “bent double, like old beggars” creating the image in my mind of old deformed men, but when in reality it is young soldiers prematurely aged and disfigured by the horror of the war. He continues in this vein to show how the soldiers were affected by the reality of war with the image ” knock kneed, coughing like hags” this simile helped me to understand Wilfred Owen’s opinion of the horror of war by contrasting the popular view of glorious, healthy young men with the image of sick, seemingly old people. By doing this Owen helped me to understand through his imagery how the war had transformed the young men.

In the second stanza Owen describes the death of a soldier in a gas attack, likening the death to the man drowning. “floundering like a man in fire or lime” showing the helplessness of the soldier to help his comrade. He continues this image by saying “as under a green sea I saw him drowning.” Owen uses these similes to help the reader understand what death was like at the front.

In the final stanza Owen’s pure fury at what the war was portrayed to be is shown. He addresses the reader, directly involving them “if you too could pace” He expresses his anger through the similes “Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud” He uses these graphic similes to undermine the idea that to die in war was a glorious and noble thing, and by doing so he helped me to understand the true reality of war and death at the front.

The idea about the horror of death in war is continued in Owen’s poem “Anthem for Doomed Youth” but it is in a more sombre tone, and he shows us a sadder more pitiful image of death in the trenches, compared to Dulce Et Decorum Est’s pure fury. He uses alliteration, personification and metaphors in “Anthem for Doomed Youth” to carry across his idea of the reality of war and especially death at the front.

The first stanza in “Anthem for Doomed Youth” is strongly aural bringing across the noise of the battlefront upon which soldiers died. In the first line he asks “What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?” already we see Owen’s view that death at the front was as nameless and pointless as cattle being slaughtered. In the following line he answers himself with “only the monstrous anger of the guns” by personifying the guns as “monstrous” we understand that they are huge and grotesque things to be feared in the minds of the soldiers. Aurally Owen conveys to us the sound of death at the front by using harsh sounding alliteration “stuttering rifles’ rapid rattle” and graphic metaphors “the shrill demented choirs of wailing shells”. By doing this Owen conveyed to me the idea that there was no sad song of mourning for the soldiers at the front, only the sounds of battle were heard as they died in their nightmarish reality.

In the second stanza we have moved away from the harsh sounds of battle at the front, and into how the deaths were recognised there. Using the metaphor “not in the hands of boys, but in their eyes shall shine the holy glimmers of goodbyes” Owen made me realise that even thought there was no proper funeral or burial of the dead at the front, the sad acknowledgement of a glance from a soldier to a fallen comrade was just as sincere if not more so than the traditions practices by those in Britain. Through his use of metaphors and other language techniques, Owen made me truly understand what life and death was like in reality at the front.

In the poems “Dulce Et Decorum Est’ and “Anthem for Doomed Youth” by Wilfred Owen, he explores the idea of the reality of war as life and death at the front. Through his use of graphic similes, metaphors and personification Owen helped me to understand that death at the front was not a glorious and heroic thing, but rather a sad and horrific way for lives to be finished.

40 Hour Famine

http://www.famine.org.nz/home/index.html

40 Hour Famine

WORLD VISION 40 HOUR FAMINE – MAY 23-25, 2008

Through the 40 Hour Famine, World Vision aims to invest in the lives of young New Zealanders, while raising life-changing funds for children overseas. Whether you participate, organise an activity for fundraising, do the Famine, or sponsor someone – you are making a positive difference in your world.

For more information talk to the members of the 40 Hour Famine Committee.

Features of a film review

Listed below are twelve general features of a film review.

1. Title of the film being reviewed

2. Reviewer’s name

3. Basic information about plot given in chronological order, without revealing the climax or conclusion

4. Basic information about main characters and actors, with reference to similar films and/or past credits.

5. Personal opinion of, and response to, the film.

6. A recommendation.

7. Language: mix of colloquial everyday language with words more often used in formal writing.

8. Tense: the plot is presented in present tense.

9. Information organisation: comments on the film techniques and themes; organised in paragraphs and often in columns; final paragraph sums up the reviewer’s opinion and assessment; film often given a visible rating.

10. Tone: reviewer’s comments can be modified by the tone of the review – whether sarcasm or irony is used; the comparative weight of positive and negative aspects; whether the recommendation is qualified in any way.

11. Comments on film-making: identified by use of technical terms and abbreviations ( for example, plot, zoom, genre, spin-off)

12. Review title is often, but not necessarily, the title of the film.

I have made a slideshow with more information about writing a review and the achievement standard requirements. To find the presentation check out moodle or follow the link below.

Film Review Slideshow