16 Questions ‘The Hunger Games’ Movie Doesn’t Answer…That the Book Does

Here’s something from Forbes for those of you that haven’t read the books yet.

Although I enjoyed the film The Hunger Games, I have a friend who hated it so much that it made him “want to gnaw both my legs off.” The movie left him with more questions than it answered—questions that I didn’t have, because I had read the novel by Suzanne Collins first. (For the record, I prefer the novel.)

Then I wondered, how many others were similarly confused? So I took my friend’s questions and answered them. I’m sharing them with you, below. In fact, if you have other questions, please let me know. I have the book right here.

Find the questions here.

A discussion with Suzanne Collins

Have you wondered what influenced Suzanne Collins to write The Hunger Games?

Q: You weave action, adventure, mythology, sci-fi, romance, and philosophy throughout The Hunger Games. What influenced the creation of The Hunger Games?

A: A significant influence would have to be the Greek myth of Theseus and the Minotaur. The myth tells how in punishment for past deeds, Athens periodically had to send seven youths and seven maidens to Crete, where they were thrown in the Labyrinth and devoured by the monstrous Minotaur.

Even as a kid, I could appreciate how ruthless this was. Crete was sending a very clear message: “Mess with us and we’ll do something worse than kill you. We’ll kill your children.” And the thing is, it was allowed; the parents sat by powerless to stop it. Theseus, who was the son of the king, volunteered to go. I guess in her own way, Katniss is a futuristic Theseus.

In keeping with the classical roots, I send my tributes into an updated version of the Roman gladiator games, which entails a ruthless government forcing people to fight to the death as popular entertainment. The world of Panem, particularly the Capitol, is loaded with Roman references. Panem itself comes from the expression “Panem et Circenses” which translates into “Bread and Circuses.”

The audiences for both the Roman games and reality TV are almost characters in themselves. They can respond with great enthusiasm or play a role in your elimination.

I was channel surfing between reality TV programming and actual war coverage when Katniss’s story came to me. One night I’m sitting there flipping around and on one channel there’s a group of young people competing for, I don’t know, money maybe? And on the next, there’s a group of young people fighting an actual war. And I was tired, and the lines began to blur in this very unsettling way, and I thought of this story.

We have already studied a text that explores the exploitive nature of reality television (The Truman Show) and discussed why people watch it. See what Collins has to say about it.

Q: The Hunger Games is an annual televised event in which one boy and one girl from each of the twelve districts is forced to participate in a fight-to-the-death on live TV. What do you think the appeal of reality television is—to both kids and adults?

A: Well, they’re often set up as games and, like sporting events, there’s an interest in seeing who wins. The contestants are usually unknown, which makes them relatable. Sometimes they have very talented people performing.

Then there’s the voyeuristic thrill—watching people being humiliated, or brought to tears, or suffering physically—which I find very disturbing. There’s also the potential for desensitizing the audience, so that when they see real tragedy playing out on, say, the news, it doesn’t have the impact it should.

Q: The book’s premise is very brutal, yet is handled so tastefully. Was this a difficult balance to achieve?

A: Yes, the death scenes are always hard to write. It’s difficult to put kids in violent situations— Gregor is in a war, Katniss is in a gladiator game. Characters will die. It’s not fun to write, but I think if you can’t commit to really doing the idea, it’s probably better to work on another type of story.

Given that, you have to remember who you’re trying to reach with the book. I try and think of how I would tell a particularly difficult event to my own children. Exactly what details they need to know to really understand it, and what would be gratuitous.

Q: The Hunger Games tackles issues like severe poverty, starvation, oppression, and the effects of war among others. What drew you to such serious subject matter?

A: That was probably my dad’s influence. He was career Air Force, a military specialist, a historian, and a doctor of political science. When I was a kid, he was gone for a year in Viet Nam. It was very important to him that we understood about certain aspects of life. So, it wasn’t enough to visit a battlefield, we needed to know why the battle occurred, how it played out, and the consequences. Fortunately, he had a gift for presenting history as a fascinating story. He also seemed to have a good sense of exactly how much a child could handle, which is quite a bit.

Q: In The Hunger Games, Katniss and Gale have an extensive knowledge of hunting, foraging, wildlife, and survival techniques. What kinds of research did you do, if any?

A: Some things I knew from listening to my dad talking about his childhood. He grew up during the Depression. For his family, hunting was not a sport but a way to put meat on the table. He also knew a certain amount about edible plants. He’d go into the woods and gather all these wild mushrooms and bring them home and sauté them. My mom wouldn’t let any of us go near them! But he’d eat them up and they never harmed him, so I guess he knew which ones were safe, because wild mushrooms can be very deadly.

I also read a big stack of wilderness survival guidebooks. And here’s what I learned: you’ve got to be really good to survive out there for more than a few days.

Q: You have written for television for young children and for middle-grade readers (the New York Times bestselling series The Underland Chronicles). Why did you decide to write for an older audience and how was the experience different?

A: I think the nature of the story dictated the age of the audience from the beginning. Both The Underland Chronicles and The Hunger Games have a lot of violence. But in The Underland Chronicles, even though human characters die, a lot of the conflict takes place between different fantastical species. Giant rats and bats and things. You can skew a little younger that way. Whereas in The Hunger Games, there’s no fantasy element, it’s futuristic sci-fi and the violence is not only human on human, it’s kid on kid. And I think that automatically moves you into an older age range.

I find there isn’t a great deal of difference technically in how you approach a story, no matter what age it’s for. I started out as a playwright for adult audiences. When television work came along, it was primarily for children. But whatever age you’re writing for, the same rules of plot, character, and theme apply. You just set up a world and try to remain true to it. If it’s filled with cuddly animated animals, chances are no one’s going to die. If it’s filled with giant flesh-and- blood rats with a grudge, there’s going to be violence.

Q: Was The Hunger Games always planned as a trilogy?

A: Not necessarily. But once I’d thought through to the end of the first book, I realized that there was no way that the story was concluded. Katniss does something that would never go unpunished in her world. There would definitely be repercussions. And so the question of whether or not to continue with a series was answered for me.

Q: How do you typically spend your workday? Do you have a routine as you write?

A: I grab some cereal and sit down to work as soon as possible. The more distractions I have to deal with before I actually begin writing, the harder focusing on the story becomes. Then I work until I’m tapped out, usually sometime in the early afternoon. If I actually write three to five hours, that’s a productive day. Some days all I do is stare at the wall. That can be productive, too, if you’re working out character and plot problems. The rest of the time, I walk around with the story slipping in and out of my thoughts.

Q: What were some of your favorite novels when you were a teen?

A:

A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith

The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter by Carson McCullers

Nineteen Eighty Four by George Orwell  (a dystopian classic)

Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut

A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle

Lord of the Flies by William Golding (read this to see some interesting connections – a great companion text)

Boris by Jaapter Haar

Germinal by Emile Zola

Dandelion Wine by Ray Bradbury

Q: What do you hope readers will come away with when they read this book?

A: Questions about how elements of the book might be relevant in their own lives. And, if they’re disturbing, what they might do about them.

Can you link the disturbing elements to our theme of Power and Control?

Hunger Games novels join most complained about titles in US

The Guardian reports that Suzanne Collins’s young adult trilogy near top of US list of ‘frequently challenged’ books in 2011.

Suzanne Collins has sold more than 23 million copies of her young adult trilogy The Hunger Games, while the film adaptation of her story of a dystopian future is smashing records at the box office. Now the American author can add a new accolade to her collection: the trilogy of books were some of the most complained-about titles in the US last year, with readers upset at the violence, offensive language and “anti-family” sentiments portrayed in the novels. These qualities place it alongside the “racism’ and “offensive language” of To Kill a Mockingbird and the “insensitivity” and “nudity” found in Brave New World.

The Hunger Games trilogy, which traces the adventures of Katniss Everdeen as she fights her fellow teenagers for survival in a huge arena, takes third place in the American Library Association’s list of the books readers tried hardest to ban last year. Reasons given for the complaints ranging from protests at Collins’ “anti-ethnic” viewpoint to her “insensitivity” and “occult/satanic” perspective.

Read the rest here.

The Hunger Games Film

It’s here but is it any good?

Well, it seems it is. Lots of positive reviews out there and Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss has been singled out for attention.

The NZ Herald said of her performance, “Lawrence’s strong, moving and nuanced performance centres the film, and even when she’s forced to commit violent acts she retains our sympathy. Best of all though, she keeps the story moving forward as the more you think about her actions, the less certain you are about her motivations”.

Jonathan Kim at The Huffington Post felt that, “The Hunger Games is steeped in the languages of reality television and instant celebrity, which young people speak fluently. When the games finally begin in a simulated forest, they’re remarkably brutal, especially for a PG-13 film, but I’m sure kids growing up today are sadly familiar with the cruelty teenagers and their cliques are capable of”.

Philip French at The Observer gave some interesting background to the novels to catch up anyone who hadn’t read the books, “This totalitarian state is modelled in part on imperial Rome, and teenagers are chosen by lot from the nation’s most deprived youth to take part in televised gladiatorial encounters that end in death for all but one contestant. The privileged citizens in the capital have Roman names (eg Cinna, Seneca, Cato, Caesar) and dress like characters in Alice in Wonderland, while the downtrodden people in the outlands have folksy rural names. The combative heroine has the Hardyesque moniker of Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence), and District 12, which she represents, resembles a coalmining town in the Appalachians from the 1930s”.

Over at stuff.co.nz Sarah Watt gave the film 4 stars and said, “The story’s Orwellian conceit is ideal for cinematic interpretation, and it is exciting to see the rendering of the book’s extreme poverty versus opulence and over-stylised costuming. The dizzying hand-held camerawork is initially a bit overbearing, but certainly sets the discomforting scene”.

I think my appetite has been suitably whetted!

Jennifer Lawrence on The Hunger Games: “It’s Not Twilight”

Excitement is building about The Hunger Games film and star Jennifer Lawrence had this to say to Vanity Fair:

Tell me about how you got to be involved in this project.

I had read the books before I even knew I would be auditioning for the movie, and was a huge fan of the material. Actually, my mom read them first and thought it was an incredible role and story. She did the same thing with Winter’s Bone, so she must be a clairvoyant, or just has really great taste. Katniss is an incredible character: she’s a hunter but not a killer, a 16-year-old who’s being forced into the arena. These kids are killing one another only because if they don’t they’ll die. It’s needless, pointless, unjustified violence. It’s heartbreaking. When I auditioned, I told [director] Gary [Ross], “I understand if you don’t hire me, but please remember that after Katniss shoots a bow and kills someone, her face cannot be badass.” So there’s nothing cool about her. It’s not like she looks around the arena and goes, Yeah, I got this. I think she looks around helplessly, and thinks, I made a promise to my sister that I would survive; now I have to kill in order to do so.

Do you worry at all about the film becoming a massive phenomenon in the way of Twilight—and what that will mean for your personal and professional life?

I try not to think too much about it. Hunger Games is not Twilight, and while I hear the comparisons, it’s really premature to say that it will be the same phenomenon. I’m so proud of the work we did on the film—Gary and the entire cast and crew were amazing, and I can’t wait for it to be brought to life because I think it’s an important story. If it does become a crazy phenomenon, I’ll soak up my freedom now!

Read the rest here.

‘The Hunger Games’: Woody Harrelson plays Haymitch with humour

When it comes to Suzanne Collins’ “The Hunger Games,” few characters are as darkly comic as Haymitch Abernathy, the jaded, seen-too-much type who once won the macabre “hunger games” competition and reluctantly guides Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark in their own bid for survival.

There are several ways to go with a wizened mentor: You could play washed-up for drama or for laughs. Woody Harrelson, who incarnates Abernathy in Gary Ross’ upcoming film adaptation, said he pushed in the direction of laughs as often as possible.

“It was my objective to give the character as much comedy as I could without it seeming not to fit,” Harrelson told 24 Frames. “I tried to take a certain comedic aspect and give a sense, through that, that he’s been through a lot and is anesthetizing himself as a result of that.”

More here.

Why The Hunger Games is way better than Twilight

Here’s some thoughts from i09 on why they think The Hunger Games is way better than Twilight. Here’s a little:

Next year, The Hunger Games movie series begins and the Twilight movies end. It’s sort of a passing of the tween torch, from vampire angst to post-apocalyptic deathmatches. And no doubt, Hunger Games will be hoping to capitalize on the Twilight audience.

But the truth is, Hunger Games is light years better than Twilight. And let’s hope that Suzanne Collins’ dystopian saga becomes more popular on screen than Stephenie Meyer’s vampire romance. Here are all the reasons why Hunger Games fills Twilight full of arrows and then lights it on fire.

In case you’ve missed both books, here’s a quick synopsis. In Twilight, vampires and werewolves are real, and a girl named Bella falls in love with a mysterious vampire, eventually marrying him and bearing his half-vampire baby. In The Hunger Games, it’s a horrible oppressive future and the evil government forces people in the “Districts” to send two young people as “Tributes” to compete in an arena of death, to remind them of the costs of rebellion. A young girl named Katniss fights in the Hunger Games and eventually becomes a symbol of defiance.

Go here for a break down of the differences. Do you agree?